Oh, awesome - more text

Quote Originally Posted by Yurneroo View Post
Or might it just mean that people got more critical and dont even bother joining such servers? To say it with your words: "Go figure".



There is no point to stay on a sinking ship the one or the other way. Even tho iRohan has its regulations, there's still no point in staying. Its like chosing between a pile of **** and a pile of **** with additional flies.
Yet, why would you care for regulations if you get the cruise for free.
You can play private servers pretty well without spending a single penny, at least the "good" ones. You'll just make yourself a good time, even tho its not guaranteed to last forever, but on the other hand what acctually lasts forever?


It seems you havnt understood what I was saying since the story with egg and chicken simply cant be compared with this. If its just about you saying such a thing just for the sake of saying something at all, I guess i can just skip this.
However, iRohan was first, nothing against it. PServers exist because of the game. No problem aswell, quiet obvious. But that doesnt have anything to do with the fact of PWi taking ideas from private servers and implementing them over here. You are talking about apples while I am talking about peaches.



Thats nice, however, like I've been pointing out before, PJ wasnt advertising neither was ishtaria.
Just because I use the word "coke" in a sentence doesnt mean im advertising coca cola.





Im always in on a good discussion, tho, I hate to keep iterating on the same stuff over and over again.

But the question in place would be, is there still any need to push this discussion any further?
People got more critical towards private servers, sure - though one can only wonder how that comes. Perhaps because the first big promise turned out to be one big disappointment and to be exactly the counterpart of what it wanted to conquer: corruption and rip-offs, aside of improving general gameplay of course. The people developing a game might not have money as their greatest motivation - the ones running the game/servers, however, usually do. I have yet to see one that is different. Is this one it? Who's to tell? The ones running it this time? That's hardly an objective answer.
The first rohan server with purely players content at heart? Possible, but not probable.

True enough, nothing is forever, but I recall the last time being rather very short. It resembled more Game of Thrones behind its scenes than anything else.

Like I said before, a private server isn't bad per se - the idea's are usually good since it builds from what already existed. It's always easier to improve something than to build something up from scratch. Not to mention that, over the course of several years since OBT, there have surfaced enough other mmo's from which certain idea's can be integrated. The only issue here is that, whereas the idea's are good, the management usually isn't. Which brings us back to iRohan or Rohan in general.

Advertising, and thus the act of informing your targeted audience by providing them the albeit biased information, which must by necessity be incomplete, not discussing everything there is to know about the subject with the basic purpose to identify and differentiate one product (or hence, service) from another in order to persuade the 'consumer' to buy or make use of said product/service in preference to another.

But you're saying that the comparison of the facebook likes, followed by a post which contained a link to said forums was not there to differentiate this server with private servers nor that the need exists to inform people in order to gain more viewers (and thus possibly clients) and, by pointing out the serious lack of facebook-likes on iRohan and the above comments do not hold any intent to persuade people to go for (actual free to play) private servers in
preference to the 'heavily pay-to-win, grow money on your backs' kind and to specifically induce on this certain aspect of it?

There are ways to have a good discussion - regardless of the re-iteration, which is mostly needed due to things being either ignored or misunderstood.

The following here below is a bad example of a discussion that does not need to be pushed any further - and is the example of the small difference between a discussion and flame.
Which, by example, I can as easily join as any other civilized discussion. One could call it being flexible.

Quote Originally Posted by PenguinJoe View Post




Not sure where you get the idea a PUN is supposed to be grammatical. Maybe you are butt hurt because you are having to stay at a server that has long ago stopped being anything but a black hole down which all your money disappears.

Perhaps I would be bitter in your shoes too. After all, if all your pals here find better places to game, you will be left here all alone - until PWi finally throws up their hands and shuts down.

But I am not in your shoes. I don't have to nitpick at puns to make myself feel better about having this as my only life.
I do have fun and fulfilling things to do with my time to the point that I only bother to troll here once every several months. And when I do, who do I see pounding on his "holier than thou" grammar bible? EaglePhoenix! So sad little man.

Congratulations on your >10000 posts trolling the bulletin board of a game that has one foot in the grave & the other on a banana peel. You truly the spamming toll extraordinaire! Take a bow.

You still have not proven in any way, shape or form that we had advertised a private server ON THIS FORUM. Calling my pun 'advertising' is a joke. Calling Ish's link to some gaming forums 'advertising' is a joke. Come on and show us some real proof!

And my pun? IT WAS IN FLUENT GRAMMATICAL MELMACIAN.
I don't 'have' to stay anywhere, moreover - I hadn't logged for about 1.5y and hadn't actually 'played' for almost 2 years before Isen, nor did I actually post on the forums for several months and on rare occasions, besides.

Being in my shoes isn't all bad though, at least I'm still potent - it makes up for all your aforementioned. For someone that's retired and does nothing else but sitting behind a desk from sunrise till dawn (old people generally need less sleep, the older they get) - talking about the lack of 'life' is quite the irony.

Those long periods in between your logging, is it really because you can't be bothered or is it in between changing diapers?

Sad little man? Here you are, retired - old but hanging around with the youngsters. Does it keep you young? Talking about having a foot in the grave and the other on a banana peel..

What is more to prove than what already has been said.


This is as much fun to me as it is to you. One could only wonder who exactly you're trying to convince this is actually fun to you? Us or yourself?

Considering those 10k+ posts, one can only assume I actually do enjoy this. One would be daft to go on like this for over 10k posts without actually enjoying it. That'd be sad, indeed.




See, I can do this too. It's even easier than coming up with some actual arguments - probably also the reason why so many people do it, anyway.
P.s.: your definition of stalking is way off - but then again, we both know how well you do with grammar and stuff.