The codes already obviously there, and its one of the few things in the past they've actually taken player feedback on.
Who really cares when the gear load outs don't represent what people are actually using on any of the servers. They might get good feedback on the event server and applied to the actual servers might be negligible on one and broken on another.
Wtf? You accuse people of being hellbent on 1vs1 right after you claim two classes that are more useful in group fights then 1v1 are useless?
I'm glad your reply just rephrased my statement, I had no idea what I was typing the first time. But please elaborate...why are dragon sage and scout suck in pvp? I'm gonna guess because they aren't really capable of bursting anyone down who's willing to pot, and they aren't really all that great at playing any kind of support role? That's right...that's because they are aoe damage classes...you know...classes good at damaging groups...which makes it pretty comical that you complain about people being fixated on 1v1 comparisons right after claiming 2 aoe classes that become more effective with more targets are useless in pvp lol.
The only thing broken about any of those classes is when your hitting 2k regs, then a temp comes over and smacks you for 20k regs. How do you fix that weakness...give them all +1000% attack? Congrats...now everything is broken!
If you had a clue...you'd understand...those classes are working fine...its the one doing the 20k+ regs that is jacked up. Screwing with the ones that are working fine to avoid doing anything to the broken one is just dumb.