Wtf hax spp disbanded animo

[EaglePhoenix]

awww I dont care that you don't care too
But if you don't care then don't say that we are jerks without a discussion of why would we be so, coz that will make me mean too

So are you perhaps saying that, with a decent discussion, you'd eventually consider to agree on being a jerk?

[bacnab]

1st it was only for 30 minutes 2ndly he is acting all big now that nobody is there to fight him.

:O, cause you never act big right :/.

[Bledos]

So are you perhaps saying that, with a decent discussion, you'd eventually consider to agree on being a jerk?

No, with a decent discussion I would know why would she call us jerks.

[EaglePhoenix]

No, with a decent discussion I would know why would she call us jerks.

But why would she make a discussion out of it if she doesn't care? Surely, one can say "he's a jerk" with an air of apathy - but devoting oneself to an actual discussion on whether or not that person should be considered a jerk is like the opposite of not caring.
One could argue,however, that since you don't care for yourself - why would you even need the discussion to begin with?

If she don't care, and you don't care - then we're done talking, aren't we?

[Bledos]

But why would she make a discussion out of it if she doesn't care? Surely, one can say "he's a jerk" with an air of apathy - but devoting oneself to an actual discussion on whether or not that person should be considered a jerk is like the opposite of not caring.
One could argue,however, that since you don't care for yourself - why would you even need the discussion to begin with?

If she don't care, and you don't care - then we're done talking, aren't we?

but if she doesn't care then why would she post this mean post?
Ofcourse she has something like... sorta of "motivation" for saying this, right?

[EaglePhoenix]

but if she doesn't care then why would she post this mean post?
Ofcourse she has something like... sorta of "motivation" for saying this, right?

You're a tad confused.
She doesn't care that you're being sad, nor about your or anyone else's "bs rag" on Tina. Obviously, the "bs rag" however, did not limit itself to Tina but affected multiple people who had had nothing to do with it.

That's her "sorta of motivation".


Then again, it could perfectly well be that she just perceives you as being a jerk. Nothing more or less.

[Bledos]

You're a tad confused.
She doesn't care that you're being sad, nor about your or anyone else's "bs rag" on Tina. Obviously, the "bs rag" however, did not limit itself to Tina but affected multiple people who had had nothing to do with it.

That's her "sorta of motivation".


Then again, it could perfectly well be that she just perceives you as being a jerk. Nothing more or less.

If she doesn't care, she shouldn't post, that's what reasonable logic says.
If she posts, then she has to accept the fact the people would like to know the reason of her said posts.
And if she didn't post the reason of her said posts, then I would just act like her and be mean to everybody without a reasonable reason

[GodsRage]

But why would she make a discussion out of it if she doesn't care? Surely, one can say "he's a jerk" with an air of apathy - but devoting oneself to an actual discussion on whether or not that person should be considered a jerk is like the opposite of not caring.
One could argue,however, that since you don't care for yourself - why would you even need the discussion to begin with?

If she don't care, and you don't care - then we're done talking, aren't we?

I think you used too many big words for him to understand there. You need to dumb it down for this fellow.

[Bledos]

you are talkin about the post where I said I don't care, eh nah I was only trollin, brb doin pa.

[EaglePhoenix]

If she doesn't care, she shouldn't post, that's what reasonable logic says.
If she posts, then she has to accept the fact the people would like to know the reason of her said posts.
And if she didn't post the reason of her said posts, then I would just act like her and be mean to everybody without a reasonable reason

Reasonable logic says that one should first read, then think, then write - think again, adjust - then post.

I also think you're missing the keywords "bs rag on Tina", but since the events did not only limit themselves to the 'bs rag on Tina', she has all the right to post (otherwise, she would too but w.e.) here or anywhere else.
That she doesn't care about the "rag on Tina", does not equal to not caring about anything else at all.

With that said, she also perfectly well explained why she deems you and "them" as being jerks. There is no discussion required - as she already pointed out: it's already there in plain sight.

Covering your eyes with your hands does not mean that nobody can see you, just because you can't see them. As such, ignoring the given facts doesn't mean they're not there.

I think you used too many big words for him to understand there. You need to dumb it down for this fellow.

Oh great, here I thought I was already making it too easy.