So guys, what you think?
Printable View
So guys, what you think?
Psy- reasons
1. Mental barrier is now based off psy
2. Equality uses both int and psy for a 100% chance of aoe auto attack
3. I think you'd benefit going 2/2 int/psy (this is questionable since you may need some vit, 300-400 is fine)
A mace you'll need should include - psy xx amount , melee attack xx% , magic attack xx% , same with gear/accs
Mental blow lvl 7 + mental barrier lvl 7 + magic barrier lvl 6 is pretty tanky
Full Psy is not good?
Magic attack Will be usefull?
you can go full psy, or 3 psy 1 vit after 70+ when you have lvl 7 equality
Build classe templar? 3 int 1 vit /lv 50 full int , This guy who said to put psy spots can only be crazy or idiot,Wanting to ruin your character.
Are you retarded ? have a look at the templar skill tree and mbQuote:
Originally Posted by sauronbr
http://imgur.com/a/kdrXR
http://imgur.com/a/uObIZ
^
why even go int if you can't use MB which is your only pdef skill to be tanky in pvp situations? This isn't like old rohan to go int, blunt mastery uses str pre 63 then it changes to psy and int at lvl 63+ with equality
Who ever came up with this stat builds is a retard and should be fired from game dev. The psy build thingy looks like wants to orient priests to be tanky as hell while the temp be a hybrid build between int and psy (offensive vs defensive)
Looks like something THH would invent.
Questionable idea IF you want to use a Club/Mace. Because hitting stuff still depends on Dex in melee, its not like old Rohan where int and Blunt Mastery made you hit regardless.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubblebutt
Still not sure why they couldn't just keep everything the same but just nerf temps. None of us asked for a mass nerf on every class, not being able to buff people and whatnot.
But yea, psy temp is the way or int/psy